I read about this guy, Jeff, over here and it bummed me out so I wrote this. I suppose a mission of mine is to reveal a way for death to enter the lives of people, sparing them the necessity to end their lives in search of death. Nonetheless, RIP Jeff, Skip, and the countless others who leap before they breathe, pause, and take a look around.
*
Put down your gun. Drop the noose.
The difference between life and death is a single breath, a pause, a nimble escape from escape.
Suicide is an answer, strong and definitive. And the answer is No. No, I won’t do it, not one day more. I reject it. Reject what? I reject THIS in all its variable thisness. The people who love you will try to convince you that your answer should be Yes. They will tell you what’s good about you, how things will get better—they’ll sound like Wilson Phillips on repeat.
If you’re swayed by their comforting Yes, then I’d wager that your initial No was nothing more than a veiled Yes that needed attention. And that’s okay. Soak it up.
But I’m writing this for the people who scream No from the hardness of their bones, for whom the comfort of attention is no balm. It irritates me when people say I have a lot to offer. A lot to offer what? It occurs to me that any contribution I offer to the world serves only to bolster and support THIS world, the world my entire organism resists. If you listen closely, you can hear my cells singing No. I am a choir of negativity.
So no, No people, I’m not writing to convert you to Yes. I do however want to, before too rashly answering (here is precisely where we need the breath and a pause), question the method of suicide as the best representative of saying No, of rejecting THIS in all its variable thisness.
The whole project of questioning suicide as the best way to reject THIS in all its variable thisness hinges on what exactly THIS is and, by saying No to THIS with death, would we perhaps be neglecting the possibility of radically rejecting THIS not with death but with an eye toward Something Else? In other words, is our common THIS a hard fact, given, taken for granted as the ONLY possible THIS, inside of which we experience only ITS kind of variable thisness?
Are there other modes of THISNESS that might open into wild new varieties of thisii?
If so, suicide as a rejection of THIS must then be construed as an affirmation of THIS as the one and only THIS, rejecting in turn the possibility of saying Yes to Something Else.
You’re tired of these abstractions. So am I. So let’s just say you’ve had enough and you want to fucking die. From your perspective of the story in which you are the narrator, you’ve endured hardship after hardship resulting in months and months of terrible feelings which all add up to the definitive thought that, yes, you do indeed want to die. There. There it is: the thought. From that thought arises the consideration of method, the plan of action, and its execution. Game over. You’re dead.
But I italicized “the thought” because I want to question what it means to arrive at a condition of consciousness that articulates itself definitively as “Yes. I do indeed want to die.” Isn’t that thought, my suicidal ones, a product itself of THIS world, the very world you reject, to which you say No? Maybe it’s precisely at this thought— here—at your most thorough disgust with existence as it is, where it all might turn, where the breath and a pause could provide the opportunity for the sun to set on THIS and, after the long night, rise on Something Else.
You will have noticed the introduction of images—the sun, dawn, night, dusk—beginning to illustrate my tedious abstractions. Well, goddamn it, THAT’S the turn, the opportunity, the escape from the escape, where metaphor begins to replace what we think we know is real.
The thought: “Yes. I do indeed want to die.” is not that thought only. It is also, at the very same time, a little girl in a black dress who grabs your hand and says Come with me. Is she scary as fuck? Yes! Her face is white as snow and her lips are the color of blood. But you can shoot yourself in the literal head or take a walk with the figurative girl. Your choice.
She leads you to a hole in the world that opens into a stairwell leading deep into the ground. The stairs are wooden. The way is sparsely lit by infrequent candles. You hesitate and she laughs at you. Come on, silly. You descend and descend deep into the underworld until you arrive at the center of the earth. This is where you’ll spend the night, the little girl says. Her dress is now white and her face is full of color. It is very cold here, but do not seek warmth prematurely, nor the solace of daylight. This is the palace of dreams where airy fantasies acquire the substance of earth.
You have many questions but the girl is gone. The cynic in you wonders if this is just a metaphor for depression but then you realize that you’re spending the night at the center of the earth and that depression is an inferior word to describe this fantasy—a fantasy that is already beginning to acquire substance. Do not flee up the stairs. Don’t start a fire. Stay cold and dark until the night is over. Do this. Until you no longer need the sun to chase the dark away because how can it? There’s no way. The sun is merely a baby cradled in the gentle arms of the dark. Learn to love the dark.
And tomorrow will not be just another day. It’ll be another kind of day that happens in a different way. Sadness is sadness but it is not sadness only. It’s blue rain as well and without the blue rain there would be no splashing in puddles, no ecstatic orange flowers, or breaks between the silver clouds for which we look up forever and ever.